fwd: Re: [Braillenote] PulseData In Violation Of The GNU Lesser GeneralPublic License, Other Comments About Opening Source/Specs]

[Gregory Nowak]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here's a response to Sabahattin's post, and I got it only because the
person included Sabahattin's original message in its entirety. I'd
like to tell this person that this is important to him, because the
company who took his money for his unit is using deceptive practices,
and is doing all it can to prevent software other then keysoft and
windows ce from running on the braillenote. But, I ask myself, if this
is the reply this individual posted, would he care, or would his reply
to my response be "well, so what"?

I'm always amazed and saddened when I see messages like this,
indicating that seemingly a lot of people could care less about the
fact that there are more liberal alternatives to microsoft and
companies like its heavy handed practices. It's a shame I think that a
lot of people out there have come to expect that it is perfectly
normal to pay big bucks for something like windows for example, that
is unstable and full of problems to boot.

Greg


- ----- Forwarded message from Jerry Weinger <jnweinger at comcast.net> -----

From: "Jerry Weinger" <jnweinger at comcast.net>
To: "Braillenote List" <braillenote at list.pulsedata.com>
Subject: Re: [Braillenote] PulseData In Violation Of The GNU Lesser
	GeneralPublic License, Other Comments About Opening Source/Specs
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:32:03 -0400

Sabahattin,
What does this mean to me, a Braillenote user.  y are you approaching the
list, rather than engaging a lawyer with what you claim to be a violation of
the law?

Sincerely,
Jerry Weinger




- ----- End forwarded message -----

- -- 
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAlTEt7s9z/XlyUyARAqtxAJ9p1NcOsZNwgp2tXzP5UuB/YbqCYwCdEhjR
fVNgRCFVhc2Ww6dsTiaDuSY=
=619C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----